Accepted zfp 1.0.1-3 (source) into unstable
- To: debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Accepted zfp 1.0.1-3 (source) into unstable
- From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:19:35 +0000
- Debian: DAK
- Debian-architecture: source
- Debian-archive-action: accept
- Debian-changes: zfp_1.0.1-3_source.changes
- Debian-source: zfp
- Debian-suite: unstable
- Debian-version: 1.0.1-3
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ftp-master.debian.org; s=smtpauto.fasolo; h=Date:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:MIME-Version:To:Reply-To:From: Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=bMEG0vH2VufgWCzYp1GexTZ3f36+it+n31CgiqZD4ho=; b=Q8kSEbKgqowEG8aRkJE46EZqx1 Sj4nn1OWV1laZSth9YZDAPdlPQyuQ2/29AtYkEid4DwwM1j1apsmrRWeNUFN3aIrDNlTPrcv187fM ntAWWLN2LbCt3zIiPcZbE4fNTfLO1y2ByEBFu9KNqwuye6vswnCs/31H1eudh4z9G9Jf0R2lxH9ir XUFR449553BgwSapvyZG+rllUH9nVNnfpZpSx2fauaBe6uc/J3IryWOFZvx/0nvi1JEm1PJLd83JT qmnHd+M+V+Nub3D6fLDPlgvLiRX4zIYZRW4qELi9NGifNsZzOYbzQiSvfFX64UKYkCTlQNd9qK9MO tUF/sNPw==;
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Message-id: <E1rQ31D-00F3ZG-3e@fasolo.debian.org>
- Reply-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:08:28 +0000
Source: zfp
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers <debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Antonio Valentino <antonio.valentino@tiscali.it>
Closes: 1060807
Changes:
zfp (1.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* debian/rules:
- Revert the changes in the BIT_STREAM_WORD_TYPE configuration
implemneted with the upload of the upstream version 1.0.1 and
skip the failing tests (Closes: #1060807).
According to https://github.com/LLNL/zfp/issues/51, test failures
in ZFP uni tests are gue to limitations of the test suite implementation
not supporting all possible configurations.
On the other hand some of the packages that depend on ZFP, like, e.g.,
h5z-fzp mandatorily require the old configuration.
* debian/patches:
- New 0002-Skip-broken-tests.patch (see comments above).
* Update d/copyright.
Checksums-Sha1:
457484e8e29bea7faee55b74b30d5fa35ad52f15 2757 zfp_1.0.1-3.dsc
268a045f17286bf4b571d78fbd352861dbe90f19 8396 zfp_1.0.1-3.debian.tar.xz
99c574335d48da7fabe89971ff9609033ccb9bec 9409 zfp_1.0.1-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
583c21d6eefc89d621b07ead7e7fbb16dedf0e47b7592fd167e2d0ea509e93da 2757 zfp_1.0.1-3.dsc
6e5325c3c2000812f50490f5a1d142df9cddb221f973efd051458545e61390ba 8396 zfp_1.0.1-3.debian.tar.xz
16d0b307e267646c27761afdf87b62541b17f59ef8485bfe8921a1a12061987e 9409 zfp_1.0.1-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
f1655df6bd28049cf5cf2fc8b88a51d1 2757 science optional zfp_1.0.1-3.dsc
428cf7c0fa3eef1f0dff13ff7515843b 8396 science optional zfp_1.0.1-3.debian.tar.xz
8f577c36fc0f3ff6b3d3366d880d3c76 9409 science optional zfp_1.0.1-3_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=2YMF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----